In Canada buying and selling of sexual services have been legal since 1947, but most surrounding activities, such as public communication for the purpose of prostitution, brothels (aka bawdy houses) and procuring are.
When I hear “there is no rational basis for making it a serious offence to keep a bawdy house” I hear “let’s traffic in human beings and set up a set up a point of sale operation.”
Organized crime will love this; no right for the police to enter buildings, no checks and balances. Does that mean if it is a legal entity, one you can import workers? Wow, I’d like to see the end game on this one. There is a lobby here to glamorize prostitution, to give it credibility, make it a plausible way to live one’s life. A clean safe work environment when at the heart of this business is degradation, drug addiction, child molestation and any and all violations of the human soul.
Even if we give clean, safe housing for sex trader workers, the kids are still on the street. Let’s keep the status quo, plus let’s charge the Johns who have sex with those who are under age with rape of a minor, charge pimps with facilitation of rape. This is not a the victimless crime.
From the mother of one of Robert Picton’s victims. “Our daughter was forced into prostitution because of the need to feed her addiction to drugs. To think of prostitution as a ‘job’ and treat it as such is ridiculous. I am disgusted to think that anyone would think that prostitution is a job. It is not. It is violence against women”.Is the best we can do for these women is give them a safe place to sell their bodies? There is no such thing as a “clean safe place” to be abused.
I am hoping to see a challenge of this law. This may be the only time I am relieved that PM Harper is in the wheel house.